I got this subjective, primitive, non-scientific expertise from Archipenko Foundation for 2000 USD.

I have provided a material test for the presentation of the statue from Bussels Artlaboratory.

The material test proves that the statue was made at the beginning of the century.

The Research Curator, Alexandra Keiser, PhD  stated that only Frecise  Gray could declare the statue she did not.

The widow why has denied her husband's most lively work ?

There are a lot of questions about the operation of the foundation and the attitude of the widow.

The investigations  launched will only clarify the confused situation.

One is sure. The Horseman transcribes the oeuvre of Alexander Archipenko.

Why accepted Fransis Gray authenticity work of Archipenko The Head wich sold by Dhoroteum

based on casting material . The signature and molding number are absurd.

What's going on ?

Archipenko's worklife can be divided into three stages.

The first is the European creative avantgard period.

The second is the burnt-out, emptied, exhausted American copy period.

The third the “Gray” period after his death.

In the third period, his work was degraded to a mass products.

They were abused with his name and the art market it was flooded with mass Archipenko’s copies.

After the death of Archipenko, the mass of copies flooded the museums and the art market.

We have come to today to determine the value of a copy of Archipenko whether it has a certificate or not. It is absurd!

This is a total embarrassment that destroys Archipenko's worklife.

The power of money, the mediocrity, the greed, kills the art.

The Museums and the art historians are in silent. It is outrageous!

The appearance of Horseman statue shows Archipenko’s real brilliant fasility face.

Fortunately the concealment of the Horseman was saved it from the mass production.

The Horseman there is an unknown and the uniquely work of Archipenko that has not been falsified yet.